Menu
Asus A7V333 in the test: VIA KT333 in top form

Asus A7V333 in the test: VIA KT333 in top form

3DMark 2000

MadOnion.com 3DMark 2000 v1.1
  • Default:
    • Asus A7V333 DDR333 CL2.0
      10.410
    • MSI KT3 Ultra DDR333 CL2.5 (AtP 5)
      10.271
    • EPoX 8K3A + DDR333 CL2.0
      10.263
    • Asus A7N266-C DDR266 C L2.0 (Dual Channel)
      10.236
    • EPoX 8KHA + DDR266 CL2.0
      10.198
  • 640x480 @ 16Bit:
    • Asus A7V333 DDR333 CL2.0
      11,969
    • EPoX 8K3A + DDR333 CL2.0
      11,938
    • Asus A7N266-C DDR266 CL2 .0 (Dual Channel)
      11.924
    • MSI KT3 Ultra DDR333 CL2.5 ( AtP 5)
      11,871
    • EPoX 8KHA + DDR266 CL2.0
      11,849

Also the somewhat dated 3DMark 2000once again shows a circuit board as the clear winner, the A7V333.

CPUMark

CPUMark
Unit: Points
    • EPoX 8KHA + DDR266 CL2.0
      651
    • Asus A7V333 DDR333 CL2.0
      651
    • Asus A7N266-C DDR266 CL2.0 (Dual Channel)
      645
    • EPoX 8K3A + DDR333 CL2.0
      643
    • MSI KT3 Ultra DDR333 CL2. 5 (AtP 5)
      642

Especially in this discipline, both the EPoX 8K3A + and the MSI KT3 Ultra performed extremely poorly. We were all the more astonished when the A7V333 suddenly took the hurdle as the front runner. However, it has to share this position with the 8KHA + (KT266A), which again performed excellently here.

3DMark 2001

MadOnion. com 3DMark 2001
Unit: points
    • Asus A7V333 DDR333 CL2.0
      5.291
    • EPoX 8K3A + DDR333 CL2.0
      5.207
    • MSI KT3 Ultra DDR333 CL2.5 (AtP 5)
      5.196
    • EPoX 8KHA + DDR266 CL2.0
      5.130
    • Asus A7N266-C DDR266 CL2.0 (Dual Channel)
      5.057

The 3DMark seems to be one of the main disciplines of the KT333. Not only were the two competing boards able to present themselves well here, the A7V333 also seems to be more than comfortable and takes the lead again, this time clearly.

On the next page: Conclusion